![]() That's the only place where there is a real tangible difference in gaming performance between these top two graphics cards from AMD. It's solely GRID 2 where the 290X actually breaks into double figures when we're calculating the performance lead over the standard 290 and even then it's coming in at just under 12% faster. So what's the performance like? Essentially what we're looking at is around the same sort of speeds as the R9 290X in 'Quiet' mode and that means it's only around 8% slower than AMD's top card running at its hottest and loudest. GeForce GTX 780 - 23(13) DirectX 11 1080p performance Metro: Last Light - FPS: higher is better Total War: Rome II - FPS: higher is better GeForce GTX 780 - 33.2 (16) DirectX 11 gaming performanceīioshock Infinite - FPS: higher is betterĬompany of Heroes 2 - FPS: higher is better It's not such good news for Nvidia in the real-world gaming benchmarks however, with the Radeon cards showing their dominance almost across the board. That's born out by the higher performance of the Titan in the Heaven 4.0 synthetic benchmark. ![]() Nvidia has been keen to point out that the GK110 GPU at the heart of its top end of graphics cards has the most raw GPU performance of all the enthusiast-class cards around right now. AMD has taken its time putting together a genuinely powerful iteration of its graphics architecture, but it looks like the wait might well have been worth it for the red side of the graphics divide.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |